Stay Current
As a society, our knowledge is growing rapidly, especially our scientific knowledge. For this reason, it is important to reconsider our conclusions on various topics from time to time. The first time my wife was pregnant, I thoroughly researched the safety of vaccines, but that was almost 10 years ago. It is possible that new scientific discoveries have changed our understanding of the safety of vaccines since that time. People often like to quip that you can't trust science because it changes. This isn't entirely true. Scientific knowledge does change, but it almost always improves by becoming more nuanced. Very rarely does scientific knowledge completely change on a subject.
In the case of vaccines, I specifically looked to see if there was a link between any vaccine and autism. When I researched it 10 years ago, there was no published scientific data showing a link (more on this under the next heading); however, it is plausible that new scientific research has found a link between vaccines and autism, especially since newer research tends to be more specific. Perhaps by testing specific vaccines given at specific times to specific populations of people, scientists have found that there is indeed a link.
I searched very thoroughly, and I found several scientific studies testing for a link between vaccines and autism, but none showed a relationship between the two. Even though the science on the subject has not changed and neither has my view, I'm glad I investigated it so that I will not embarrass myself and so that I can have stronger epistemic justification for my view.
Be Consistently Skeptical
As part of my investigation, I watched the documentary Vaxxed in order to understand why people think there is a link between vaccines and autism. One of the people featured in the documentary was part of a team investigating the MMR vaccine and he claims that he found a correlation between the vaccine and autism, but out of fear of losing his job, the leader of the team (DeStefano) covered it up and only published the analyses that showed no correlation. Most of the documentary is about the cover up, but it also includes several emotionally powerful stories of kids who developed autism shortly after receiving the vaccine.
The documentary is very well done and has a powerful emotional appeal, but ultimately, it should not be persuasive. At best, the producers of the documentary cast doubt on a single research study. From that same study, they present the "true" data to show there is a link; however, these analyses have not been subject to peer-review nor is the data available in enough detail to evaluate the reliability of the analyses. Just because the producers of the documentary present themselves as unbiased outsiders doesn't mean they are unbiased nor does it mean they are capable of performing the complex statistical calculations they claim to have done.
In searching the peer-reviewed scientific literature, I found 38 other studies that reported no link between autism and any vaccine. These studies were conducted by a ton of different scientists in several countries from multiple scientific disciplines using funding from all kinds of different sources so it's extremely unlikely that government or big pharma conspiracies can explain these results.
Moreover, there was not a single reputable scientific study showing a link between vaccines and autism. There have been three (two use the same data set) that found a link. The original study by Andrew Wakefield in 1998 that started the whole issue with vaccines and autism has been retracted and discredited due to methodological issues (small, biased sample). The two recent ones, funded by anti-vaxxers, also have sampling biases and weren't able to get published in a legitimate scientific journal so they were published in an open source journal (pay to publish journal). Despite all this, it's debatable whether they even show a link since they don't adjust statistical significance levels to account for multiple statistical tests (see notes in references below).
The point here is that we cannot trust someone simply because they claim to be an unbiased whistle-blower who has special knowledge. Likewise, we can't base conclusions off of the absence of evidence either (unless we have really good reasons for thinking the evidence should exist). We need to be just as skeptical of these people and claims as we are with mainstream claims. Ironically, I often see the same tactic used to support atheism. When sheltered Christians first learn about evolution, hear claims that the Bible has contradictions, or find out that there is limited non-Christian accounts of Jesus, they uncritically accept these as evidence against Christianity and leave the faith. Had they been skeptical of these objections and searched for Christian responses, they would realize these are non-issues.
Love Your Neighbor
Jesus sacrificed His life to save ours. As Christians, we are called to be like Christ. Not only are we to love our neighbors as ourselves (Mark 12:30), but we are to consider others as more important than ourselves (Philippians 2:3). Vaccines are a simple measure that improves quality of life and prevents death. Unfortunately, not everyone can get them. Infants, elderly, those who are allergic to some of the ingredients, cancer patients, and others are sometimes unable to receive vaccines. Thankfully, they can receive protection from illnesses when others get vaccinated. This is because when a greater number of people get vaccinated, fewer people will contract the disease and the few vaccinated people who get the disease will spread it to fewer people since they'll have it for a shorter period of time.
Getting vaccinated is a simple and effective way to love your neighbor by decreasing the chances they will get sick. Yes, there are some risks. Here's the CDC's list of possible side-effects, most of which are rare and minor, although there a few major ones (on a side note, why are these major risks accepted by the scientific community but the link with autism isn't? 🤔) The risks associated with vaccines are smaller than the risk of not getting them, but if you're still not willing to get them for yourself or children, please consider doing it for the sake of others. Nobody is asking you to lay down your life or your kids' lives for others, but to simply take a small risk.
Conclusion
There is a lot of information in our world and very little time for us to really learn about and understand it all. Thankfully, we don't have to because we have experts who spend their lives studying topics in great depth. It is possible that the experts are wrong, but unless we have advanced knowledge in an area and very good reasons for rejecting what the experts say, it's probably best that we stick with the experts. If we, as non-experts, disagree with experts, we are likely the ones getting something wrong, not them.
Additionally, rejecting expert views calls into question our credibility and intelligence so that our ability to preach the gospel is greatly diminished. Again, this is worth doing, but only if we have strong reasons for doing so. In regards to vaccines, most people just aren't knowledgeable enough in the science and statistical methods used in order to take a rational stand against the experts.
Reasons to Believe (RTB), which is a ministry that focuses on science, has done some excellent work on this subject as well. Here's a couple of their articles and videos, which echo what I've said and goes into more detail in some ways. Here's their article on how vaccines are a way to love your neighbor, an article on vaccine safety, a video on vaccines from a Christian worldview, and a final video below by one of the RTB scholars, AJ Roberts who has done scientific work on vaccines.
The young-earth creationist ministry, Answers in Genesis, has also made favorable statements about vaccines in articles here and here. Likewise, the Discovery Institute, the other major ministry that focuses on science, has made favorable comments about vaccines here and here. My hope is not that people will get vaccinated, which is good for society, but that Christians will come to see that vaccines work because of our God-given design, and therefore, become proponents for them.
References
This first set of articles are all the ones that found no link between the MMR vaccine or those containing thimerosal and autism.
Andrews N, Miller E,
Grant A, Stowe J, Osborne V, Taylor B. Thimerosal exposure in infants and
developmental disorders: a retrospective cohort study in the United Kingdom does
not support a causal association. Pediatrics. 2004;114:584-591.
Davis RL, Kramarz P,
Bohlke K, et al. Measles-mumps-rubella and other measles-containing vaccines do
not increase the risk for inflammatory bowel disease: a case control study from
the Vaccine Safety Datalink project. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:354-59
Demicheli, Vittorio,
Tom Jefferson, Alessandro Rivetti, and Deirdre Price. "Vaccines for
measles, mumps and rubella in children." Cochrane Database Syst
Rev 4, no. 4 (2005).
DeStefano,
Frank, Tanya Karapurkar Bhasin, William W. Thompson, Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp,
and Coleen Boyle. "Age at first measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in
children with autism and school-matched control subjects: a population-based
study in metropolitan Atlanta." Pediatrics 113, no. 2 (2004):
259-266. This is the article that is challenged in the documentary Vaxxed , yet there is no actual published evidence that the data were wrong. Even if we toss this one out, there are still all these other articles.
DeStefano F, Chen
RT. Negative association between MMR and autism. Lancet. 1999;353:1986-1987.
DeStefano, F., &
Shimabukuro, T. T. (2019). The MMR Vaccine and Autism. Annual review of
virology, 6.
DeStefano, F., Bodenstab, H. M., & Offit, P. A. (2019). Principal Controversies in Vaccine Safety in the United States. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 69(4), 726–731.
DeStefano, F., Bodenstab, H. M., & Offit, P. A. (2019). Principal Controversies in Vaccine Safety in the United States. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 69(4), 726–731.
Doja, Asif, and
Wendy Roberts. "Immunizations and autism: a review of the literature.” Canadian
Journal of Neurological Sciences 33, no. 4 (2006): 341-346.
Dudley, M. Z.,
Salmon, D. A., Halsey, N. A., Orenstein, W. A., Limaye, R. J., O’Leary, S. T.,
& Omer, S. B. (2018). Do Vaccines Cause Autism?. In The Clinician’s
Vaccine Safety Resource Guide (pp. 197-204). Springer, Cham.
Farrington, C.
Paddy, Elizabeth Miller, and Brent Taylor. "MMR and autism: further
evidence against a causal association." Vaccine 19, no.
27 (2001): 3632-3635.
Fombonne E, Zakarian
R, Bennett A, Meng L, McLean-Heywood D. Pervasive developmental disorders in
Montreal, Quebec, Canada: prevalence and links with immunizations. Pediatrics.
2006;118:E139-150.
Fombonne E,
Chakrabarti S. No evidence for a new variant of measles-mumps-rubella-induced
autism. Pediatrics. 2001;108:E58.
Fombonne E, Cook EH
Jr. MMR and autistic enterocolitis: consistent epidemiological failure to find
an association. Mol Psychiatry. 2003;8:133-134.
Heron J, Golding J.
Thimerosal exposure in infants and developmental disorders: a prospective
cohort study in the United Kingdom does not support a causal association.
Pediatrics. 2004;114:577-583.
Hviid A, Stellfeld
M, Wohlfahrt J, Melbye M. Association between thimerosal-containing vaccine and
autism. JAMA. 2003;290:1763–6.
Hviid, A., Hansen,
J. V., Frisch, M., & Melbye, M. (2019). Measles, Mumps, Rubella Vaccination
and Autism: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Annals of internal medicine.
Honda H, Shimizu Y,
Rutter M. No effect of MMR withdrawal on the incidence of autism: a total
population study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005;46:572-579
Hornig, Mady, Thomas
Briese, Timothy Buie, Margaret L. Bauman, Gregory Lauwers, Ulrike Siemetzki,
Kimberly Hummel et al. "Lack of association between measles virus vaccine
and autism with enteropathy: a case-control study." PloS one 3,
no. 9 (2008): e3140.
Jain, Anjali, Jaclyn
Marshall, Ami Buikema, Tim Bancroft, Jonathan P. Kelly, and Craig J.
Newschaffer. "Autism occurrence by MMR vaccine status among US children
with older siblings with and without autism." Jama 313,
no. 15 (2015): 1534-1540.
Kaye, James A.,
Maria del Mar Melero-Montes, and Hershel Jick. "Mumps, measles, and
rubella vaccine and the incidence of autism recorded by general practitioners:
a time trend analysis." Bmj 322, no. 7284 (2001):
460-463.
Madsen, Kreesten
Meldgaard, Anders Hviid, Mogens Vestergaard, Diana Schendel, Jan Wohlfahrt,
Poul Thorsen, Jørn Olsen, and Mads Melbye. "A population-based study of
measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism." New England
Journal of Medicine 347, no. 19 (2002): 1477-1482.
Madsen KM, Lauritsen
MB, Pedersen CB, et al. Thimerosal and the occurrence of autism: negative
ecological evidence from Danish population-based data. Pediatrics.
2003;112:604-606.
Maglione, Margaret
A., Lopamudra Das, Laura Raaen, Alexandria Smith, Ramya Chari, Sydne Newberry,
Roberta Shanman, Tanja Perry, Matthew Bidwell Goetz, and Courtney Gidengil.
"Safety of vaccines used for routine immunization of US children: a
systematic review." Pediatrics 134, no. 2 (2014):
325-337.
Mandy, William, and
Meng‐Chuan Lai. "Annual research review: the role of the environment in
the developmental psychopathology of autism spectrum condition." Journal
of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 57, no. 3 (2016): 271-292.
Mrozek-Budzyn D,
Kiełtyka A, Majewska R. Lack of association between measles-mumps-rubella vaccination
and autism in children: a case-control study. Pediatr Infect Dis J.
2010;29(5):397–400
Newschaffer, Craig
J., Daniele Fallin, and Nora L. Lee. "Heritable and nonheritable risk
factors for autism spectrum disorders." Epidemiologic Reviews 24,
no. 2 (2002): 137-153.
Parker, Sarah K.,
Benjamin Schwartz, James Todd, and Larry K. Pickering.
"Thimerosal-containing vaccines and autistic spectrum disorder: a critical
review of published original data." Pediatrics 114, no. 3
(2004): 793-804.
Peltola H, Patja A,
Leinikki P, Valle M, Davidkin I, Paunio M. No evidence for measles, mumps and
rubella vaccine associated inflammatory bowel disease or autism in a 14-year
prospective study. Lancet. 1998;351:1327-1328.
Picciotto IH, Green
PG, Delwiche L, et. al. Blood mercury concentrations in CHARGE study children
with and without autism. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(1):161-166.
Plotkin, Stanley,
Jeffrey S. Gerber, and Paul A. Offit. "Vaccines and autism: a tale of
shifting hypotheses." Clinical Infectious Diseases 48,
no. 4 (2009): 456-461.
Price, Cristofer S.,
William W. Thompson, Barbara Goodson, Eric S. Weintraub, Lisa A. Croen,
Virginia L. Hinrichsen, Michael Marcy et al. "Prenatal and infant exposure
to thimerosal from vaccines and immunoglobulins and risk of autism." Pediatrics (2010):
peds-2010.
Price CS, Thompson
WW, Goodson B, et. al. Prenatal and infant exposure to thimerosal from vaccines
and immunoglobulins and risk of autism. Pediatrics. 2010;126:656-664
Richler, J., Luyster, R., Risi, S., Hsu, W. L., Dawson, G., Bernier, R., ... & Goudie-Nice, J. (2006). Is there a ‘regressive phenotype’of autism spectrum disorder associated with the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine? A CPEA study. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 36(3), 299-316.
Rutter, Michael. "Incidence of autism spectrum disorders: changes over time and their meaning." Acta paediatrica 94, no. 1 (2005): 2-15.
Rutter, Michael. "Incidence of autism spectrum disorders: changes over time and their meaning." Acta paediatrica 94, no. 1 (2005): 2-15.
Schechter R, Grether
JK. Continuing increases in autism reported to California’s developmental
services system: Mercury in retrograde. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65:19-24.
Stehr-Green P, Tull
P, Stellfeld M, Mortenson PB, Simpson D. Autism and thimerosal-containing
vaccines: lack of consistent evidence for an association. Am J Prev Med.
2003;25:101-106.
Taylor LE,
Swerdfeger AL, Eslick GD. Vaccines are not associated with autism: An
evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Vaccine. 2014
June;32(29):3623–3629.
Taylor B, Miller E,
Farrington CP, et al. Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: no
epidemiological evidence for a causal association. Lancet.
1999;353(9169):2026–2029
Tozzi AE, Bisiacchi
P, Tarantino V, et. al. Neuropsychological performance 10 years after
immunization in infancy with thimerosal-containing vaccines. Pediatrics.
2009;123(2):475-482.
Uchiyama, T., Kurosawa, M., & Inaba, Y. (2007). MMR-vaccine and regression in autism spectrum disorders: negative results presented from Japan. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 37(2), 210-217.
Uno Y, Uchiyama T, Kurosawa M, Aleksic B, Ozaki N. The combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines and the total number of vaccines are not associated with development of autism spectrum disorder: the first case–control study in Asia. Vaccine. 2012;30(28):4292–4298
Uno Y, Uchiyama T, Kurosawa M, Aleksic B, Ozaki N. The combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines and the total number of vaccines are not associated with development of autism spectrum disorder: the first case–control study in Asia. Vaccine. 2012;30(28):4292–4298
Verstraeten T, Davis
RL, DeStefano F, et al. Study of thimerosal-containing vaccines: a two-phased
study of computerized health maintenance organization databases. Pediatrics.
2003;112:1039- 1048.
Wilson, Kumanan, Ed
Mills, Cory Ross, Jessie McGowan, and Alex Jadad. "Association of autistic
spectrum disorder and the measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: a systematic
review of current epidemiological evidence." Archives of
Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 157, no. 7 (2003): 628-634.
This is a non-exhaustive list of articles that investigate the psychological factors of people who think there is a link between autism and vaccines, suggesting there might be a psychological explanation for why some people think there's a link.
Betsch, C., &
Sachse, K. (2013). Debunking vaccination myths: Strong risk negations can
increase perceived vaccination risks. Health psychology, 32(2),
146.
Browne, M., Thomson,
P., Rockloff, M. J., & Pennycook, G. (2015). Going against the herd:
psychological and cultural factors underlying the ‘vaccination confidence
gap’. PLoS One, 10(9), e0132562.
Gulyn, L. M., & Diaz-Asper, C. (2018). Exploring Perceptions of Blame for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 30(5), 587-600.
Hornsey, M. J.,
Harris, E. A., & Fielding, K. S. (2018). The psychological roots of
anti-vaccination attitudes: A 24-nation investigation. Health
Psychology, 37(4), 307.
Jolley, D., &
Douglas, K. M. (2017). Prevention is better than cure: Addressing anti‐vaccine
conspiracy theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(8),
459-469.
Larson, H. J.,
Jarrett, C., Eckersberger, E., Smith, D. M., & Paterson, P. (2014).
Understanding vaccine hesitancy around vaccines and vaccination from a global
perspective: a systematic review of published literature, 2007–2012. Vaccine, 32(19),
2150-2159.
Mitra, T., Counts,
S., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2016, March). Understanding anti-vaccination
attitudes in social media. In Tenth International AAAI Conference on
Web and Social Media.
Pluviano, S., Watt,
C., Ragazzini, G., & Della Sala, S. (2019). Parents’ beliefs in
misinformation about vaccines are strengthened by pro-vaccine campaigns. Cognitive
processing, 1-7.
Here are the only two peer-reviewed articles that have ever shown a link between vaccines and autism. Both of them have been retracted due to methodological issues such as biased sampling or poor controls.
Wakefield, Andrew
J., Simon H. Murch, Andrew Anthony, John Linnell, D. M. Casson, Mohsin Malik,
Mark Berelowitz et al. "RETRACTED: Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia,
non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children."
(1998): 637-641. Article has since been debunked and retracted due to
methodological errors. This is the original article that started the
controversy.
Mawson, Anthony R.,
Azad Bhuiyan, Binu Jacob, and Brian D. Ray. (2017). "Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12-year old U.S. children." Journal of Translational Science, 3(3), 1-12. Three results regarding autism and vaccines, two of
them are significant at .05, but not .01. The other is significant at .01.
Mawson, A. R., Bhuiyan, A., Jacob, B., & Ray, B. D. (2017). Preterm birth, vaccination and neurodevelopmental disorders: a cross-sectional study of 6-to 12-year-old vaccinated and unvaccinated children. J Transl Sci, 3(3), 1-8. These two "studies" are not published in reputable perr-reviewed journals and use a single data set. They also group all vaccinated children together, looking at neurodevelopmental disorders (not just autism) and all vaccines (not just MMR). The data comes from a "convenience sample" of homeschool children who are both more likely not to vaccinate and to have a neurodevelopmental disorder (which is why they homeschool). Here’s a more detailed response to these articles. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/no-two-studies-purporting-to-show-that-vaccinated-children-are-sicker-than-unvaccinated-children-show-nothing-of-the-sort/ Here’s another critique of the study. https://www.snopes.com/2017/05/17/vaccine-study-autism/
Update: I was recently sent this article which appears to show a link between a different vaccine (Hep B) and autism. After reading it, it seems like a classic case of data fishing, which is when you have a large dataset and go digging for random correlations. In this case, out of 80,000 kids, they found a correlation with autism from on 9 kids who had autism and the vaccine and did no correction to control for type I error, which is they did, there would not be a significant correlation. Moreover, if we consider these results reliable, we must also accept that being a single-mother causes autism, which is what this study also reports.
Gallagher, C. M., & Goodman, M. S. (2010). Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997–2002. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 73(24), 1665-1677.
Mawson, A. R., Bhuiyan, A., Jacob, B., & Ray, B. D. (2017). Preterm birth, vaccination and neurodevelopmental disorders: a cross-sectional study of 6-to 12-year-old vaccinated and unvaccinated children. J Transl Sci, 3(3), 1-8. These two "studies" are not published in reputable perr-reviewed journals and use a single data set. They also group all vaccinated children together, looking at neurodevelopmental disorders (not just autism) and all vaccines (not just MMR). The data comes from a "convenience sample" of homeschool children who are both more likely not to vaccinate and to have a neurodevelopmental disorder (which is why they homeschool). Here’s a more detailed response to these articles. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/no-two-studies-purporting-to-show-that-vaccinated-children-are-sicker-than-unvaccinated-children-show-nothing-of-the-sort/ Here’s another critique of the study. https://www.snopes.com/2017/05/17/vaccine-study-autism/
Update: I was recently sent this article which appears to show a link between a different vaccine (Hep B) and autism. After reading it, it seems like a classic case of data fishing, which is when you have a large dataset and go digging for random correlations. In this case, out of 80,000 kids, they found a correlation with autism from on 9 kids who had autism and the vaccine and did no correction to control for type I error, which is they did, there would not be a significant correlation. Moreover, if we consider these results reliable, we must also accept that being a single-mother causes autism, which is what this study also reports.
Gallagher, C. M., & Goodman, M. S. (2010). Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997–2002. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, 73(24), 1665-1677.
Here are some sites that list additional studies showing no link between the MMR vaccine and autism. These are all probably listed above, but there might be a few extras that aren't.
Have you looked at the science on Robert Kennedy Jr's website? Have you looked at the reports from VAERS? The damages that have been paid out from vaccine injury. Have you listened to discussions from Dr. Tenpenny? I would encourage further research in this area.
ReplyDeleteThank you for taking the time to read the article and leave a comment. I am aware of the sources you mentioned, but as far as I know, this is the first time I've heard of Dr. Tenpenny.
DeleteOne thing to keep in mind with the court system is that those decisions are not made by scientists or experts in the field. Judges and juries have little or no training in the scientific method, statistical analysis, epidemiology, or the psychological science of bias and decision making. Unless a person understands these things, they cannot make an informed decision on the matter. For instance, how do we know that there is not a type I or type II error in the research on vaccines? Could there be other explanations for what appears to be a link such as an attribution error or data fishing? Have the studies investigating a link been sufficiently powered to find a link? Why is it that there are no peer-reviewed articles showing a link if there is one (conspiracy theories about big pharma and government cover-ups are laughable to anyone who actual does science, plus they don't actually explain the facts)?
The peer-review process is not perfect, but it does promote a high-level of scholarly work. There are plenty of peer-reviewed articles showing negative side-effects from vaccines, some of which are pretty serious, yet none showing a link with autism (and all that have investigated it show no link). I know it's hard to hear, but maybe the apparent link between autism and vaccines is just a case of a small minority of people, some of whom are very smart, speaking about things they don't understand very well. There's a reason there are virtually no legitimate experts who claim there is a link between the two.
Thought this would be a good time to revisit this article and comment. Dr. Tenpenny exposed herself when she claimed covid vaccines could "magnetize" you and I think she claimed vaccines may also hook you up to 5G towers. Apologies if that was someone else, but I know she mentioned magnets.
DeleteTo reiterate the author's point, if you have no knowledge of how magnets, or radio waves, or nanotechnology work, maybe you'd believe this, but it is, to be as generous as I can, impossible. Dr. Tenpenny is therefore not a reliable source and never has been.
And VAERS is reliant on individuals to self-report information. This means we have limited, if any, documented evidence that all of the reports are true, and the issue of correlation vs causation.